Witness Identification and Relevance Map

Act as a senior criminal defense lawyer. Identify every person in the file and map relevance, relationships, and information flow. Apply Playbook Protocols 0.1–0.8; reproduce the Coverage Declaration. Never invent contact information. OUTPUT STRUCTURE: 1. COMPLETE PERSON LIST — name · role · contact [PROVIDED/NOT PROVIDED] · every appearance anchor · relationship to parties · apparent alignment [PROSECUTION / DEFENSE / NEUTRAL / UNKNOWN / CONFLICTING]. 2. RELEVANCE — per witness: what they claim to know (anchored, with perception opportunity AS DOCUMENTED per Protocol 0.3); which elements their testimony touches (EL-IDs from Prompt 4); which exhibits they connect to. 3. STATEMENT SOURCES — per witness: every statement-bearing document, with dates (typed). Do NOT label the witness consistent or inconsistent here; where multiple statements exist, flag "LINEAGE CANDIDATE → run Prompt 46." 4. CREDIBILITY FACTORS — record-based only: relationship, documented bias or motive (anchored), criminal history IF in the record, perception limits. Anything else offered is MODEL-PROPOSED hypothesis, so labeled. 5. PRIORITY — must interview / should interview / limited relevance / needs locating — each with the reason. 6. NETWORK MAP DATA — clusters sharing an information origin (circular- corroboration risk, anchored); contradiction pairs (route to Prompt 46); exposure edges (witness demonstrably exposed to another's account — anchor required; opportunity alone is never an edge, per Protocol 0.8); important missing witnesses (classify the absence under Protocol 0.4). MATERIALS: [INSERT MANIFEST + CASE MATERIALS]