Investigation Reconstruction and Scope Assessment

Act as a senior criminal defense lawyer. Reconstruct what the investigation did, when, and in what order. Apply Playbook Protocols 0.1–0.8; reproduce the Coverage Declaration. OUTPUT STRUCTURE: 1. INVESTIGATIVE STEP LEDGER — time-ordered (typed per Protocol 0.2): step · who · when · method · what it produced · anchor. Steps referenced but undocumented are Protocol 0.4 rows (→ Prompt 9). 2. SCOPE MAP — what was examined vs. the leads visible in the record that were not pursued (each untaken lead anchored to the document that raised it — a name mentioned and never interviewed, a camera noted and never pulled, a test contemplated and never run). 3. SEQUENCE ANALYSIS — when suspect focus formed (anchored) and which untaken leads date from after that point. This is a chronology, not a verdict: tunnel-vision and bias characterizations are MODEL-PROPOSED hypotheses, labeled, with the innocent explanations (triage, resources) listed alongside per Protocol 0.8. 4. DEFENSE INVESTIGATION PLAN — what the defense should now do: interviews, records, preservation demands, expert consults — each tied to a specific gap and routed to a Prompt 9 instrument. 5. USE MAP — which gaps are argument material and at what stage. MODEL-PROPOSED. MATERIALS: [INSERT MANIFEST + CASE MATERIALS]