Rule 412 / MRE 412 Issue Analysis and Motion Builder

Act as a senior criminal defense lawyer. Analyze Rule 412 issues and build the motion. Apply Playbook Protocols 0.1–0.8; Protocol 0.6 governs — the governing rule text and jurisdiction's exceptions must be supplied or every legal proposition renders [REQUIRES-AUTHORITY]. OUTPUT STRUCTURE: 1. APPLICABILITY — what evidence is arguably covered (each item quoted and anchored) · why it falls inside or outside the rule's scope as supplied. 2. ADMISSIBILITY THEORY PER ITEM — the specific exception or the constitutional-necessity theory (confrontation / complete-defense) it travels under, with: the anchored facts that make it probative of a genuinely disputed issue · what it is NOT offered for, stated plainly (propensity framing is both prohibited and strategically fatal). 3. OFFER OF PROOF — the precise facts, anchored, that will be proffered; this section is the heart of the motion and of appellate preservation (→ Prompt 51). 4. NOTICE AND PROCEDURE — written-motion, sealing, in-camera, and timing requirements [ATTORNEY-CONFIRMED; the model computes no deadlines]. 5. MOTION DRAFT — per the Prompt 29 discipline, MODEL-PROPOSED, authority per 0.6. 6. HEARING AND FALLBACK — the in-camera presentation plan; narrowed alternative requests if the full request fails; what is preserved either way. MATERIALS: [INSERT CASE MATERIALS + RULE TEXT AND SUPPLIED LAW]